July 11th, 2012
WWIB: I See London
If I can see through your pants to your underwear, then clearly your pants are not pants. I don’t know what to call them because I don’t own a pair of pants that fail at being pants. If I did, they wouldn’t be pants. Ok we can go in circles like this forever, the real question is which one of these non-pants would you want to get into?
Georgia & Pennsylvania
WWIB: I See London,
39 Comments, Comment or Ping
The one on the left. It looks like she’s trying to cover them with a “skirt”. Cover up, lady!
July 11th, 2012
Just plain gross, but it could be worse – they could be wearing things!
July 11th, 2012
I meant ‘thongs’
July 11th, 2012
Those arent Camel Toes….Those are Moose Lips
July 11th, 2012
Only thing more gross would be watching them fart as it bubbles down thier leg
July 11th, 2012
I don’t know but who’s the chick in the yellow shirt? She’s got potential!
July 11th, 2012
Clearly these women need a full length mirror to check themselves out before they leave the house. The one on the left… funny how her pants are loose at the bottom but stretched to the max higher up. If she rubbed against something they’d get a run!!
July 11th, 2012
Those two “boxcars”? Neither one! EWWWWWW!
July 11th, 2012
I wouldn’t touch either one with your pole!
July 11th, 2012
forget the see-through factor and just say NO! to spandex pants!
July 11th, 2012
What a silly question. I would obviously need to try both. I mean, how can I tell just by looking at their giant panties how tight their vaginas are?
July 11th, 2012
The one in the yellow shirt for sure…..
July 11th, 2012
They both look good [aside from the fashion faux pas of wearing see through pants], but if I can only have one I’ll take the woman in the blue shirt.
July 11th, 2012
Ugh, Realistic…too much info there! I vote for the one on the left….they really highlight her lumpy cottage cheese legs.
July 11th, 2012
Gross on all levels.
July 11th, 2012
The pants probably weren’t see-through before they were stretched to the limit.
July 11th, 2012
Gross and disgusting! Enough said. Much more than I needed to see while I was eating lunch.
July 11th, 2012
Don’t these people look in a mirror before they leave the house?!
July 11th, 2012
You left out the choice of cutting one’s own throat.
That might be the choice I’d take. I really don’t care for big nasty(bring your own antibiotics) type asses on my women.
July 11th, 2012
I wouldn’t touch either one of them with a politician’s pecker.
July 11th, 2012
Hey boys – tight pants, better chance……
July 11th, 2012
I love the nice big ass on the right. PoWM is showing the good shit.
July 11th, 2012
i see London, i see france (and a bit of Italy, the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia and most of the former Soviet Union)
July 11th, 2012
That’s why Adam invented masturbation
July 11th, 2012
How far up the ass is yellow panty?
July 11th, 2012
Looks like the woman on the left pinched a loaf in her pants, do you see the bulge??? I see something, and the chick on the right, I like but is it me or she didn’t wipe too good after using the bathroom. Looks like a poop stain her panties there, or is it a label of what size them pants really are.
July 11th, 2012
at least there are NO skidmarks..
July 12th, 2012
Why, with every submission regarding scantily clad women, does the caption and the following comments always need to revert back to “Who would you do?” How about neither? How about we all just marvel at the fact that these women thought that wearing this was OK? Why does it always need to be hyper – sexual? This is gross. That is where it should end. No one gives a flying f*** where you want to stick your d***.
July 12th, 2012
@GEMA
With you there! And thanks GEMA. By these pictures, we know what kinds of bad taste in clothes people are capable of.
But giving public opps to one’s trashy private thoughts makes you the equivalent of people who don’t know how to dress for the public.
They don’t know what to say for public consumption either.
Trash is trash.
July 12th, 2012
Who wears it better? The one on the right
July 12th, 2012
The one on the right all day!!!
July 13th, 2012
Who wears it better? No one!
The need a better advertising agent. They may be shopping, but I’m not buying.
July 13th, 2012
Definitely the one on the right.. Wait… the girl in the yellow doesn’t count?
July 15th, 2012
Both look terrible,come on girls,are you really that stupid?
July 16th, 2012
Giggity giggity.. Oooo.. uhh maybe the one on the right…
July 16th, 2012
The one on the right looks like she bought some footless tights and decided to wear them as pants. The one on the left, well, when fabric stretches that far, it tends to become transparent. PEOPLE, WALMART SELLS MIRRORS. FULL LENGTH ONES AT REASONABLE PRICES. BUY ONE AND USE IT. Just GROSS. And didn’t their mama ever teach them NOT to wear colored undies under light colored pants or skirts? That was the first no no. But as someone else said, at least they didn’t decide to wear their favorite thong that morning. Ewwww.
Again: TIGHTS ARE NOT PANTS. If you buy them in the sock isle, wrapped in a piece of paper packaging, and they say “footless tights” they belong UNDER other clothing.
July 17th, 2012
Well…. at least they have underwear on. Would much rather see this than someone going commando. O_O
July 19th, 2012
Oh those poor undies, someone call the police!
July 22nd, 2012
the one on the right looks like a pack of pillsbury grands that got banged against the kitchen counter too hard.,..
August 13th, 2012
Reply to “WWIB: I See London”